In a stunning rebuke, combat surgeon Dr. Adam Hamawi has fiercely criticized Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s aggressive war rhetoric under the Trump administration, warning that “negotiating with bombs“ will lead to catastrophic civilian losses and failed outcomes, as seen in past conflicts like Iraq and Afghanistan.
This explosive interview, aired on the Midas Touch Network, reveals deep concerns from a military veteran turned congressional candidate about the escalating threats against Iran. Hamawi, who served as a combat surgeon in Iraq and volunteered in Gaza, draws from firsthand experience to denounce the Trump regime’s zeal for airstrikes, calling it reckless and morally bankrupt.
Hegseth’s comments, doubling down on bombing as a path to diplomacy, have ignited alarm among experts. In the transcript, Hamawi recounts the horrors of war, emphasizing how such tactics destroyed infrastructure in Iraq without achieving lasting peace, ultimately fueling groups like ISIS and eroding U.S. global standing.
The surgeon’s critique extends to recent presidential statements targeting Iranian power plants and oil wells, tactics akin to those used by Putin in Ukraine—actions the U.S. has previously condemned. Hamawi argues this hypocrisy undermines international law, potentially inviting retaliation and making Americans less safe in the long run.
As a man who saved lives on the battlefield, including that of Senator Tammy Duckworth, Hamawi stresses the human toll of unchecked aggression. He warns that targeting civilian sites, like hospitals, crosses ethical lines and could lead to a “Gazafication“ of conflicts, where indiscriminate bombing breeds endless cycles of violence.
In the interview, Hamawi navigates the delicate balance of supporting troops while opposing flawed leadership. He distinguishes between patriotic service members, often driven by personal sacrifice, and the politicians issuing “bad orders“ that put lives at risk without congressional approval or imminent threats.
This comes amid growing fears of domestic misuse of military forces, such as deploying the National Guard against civilians. Hamawi urges service members to uphold their oaths to the Constitution, even if it means defying illegal commands, drawing parallels to historical accountability like the Nuremberg trials.
The conversation also touches on broader issues, from the economic burdens of endless wars to healthcare failures affecting everyday Americans. Hamawi, now running for Congress in New Jersey’s 12th district, highlights how billions spent on conflicts divert resources from domestic priorities like affordable healthcare and education.
His words carry urgency, especially as tensions with Iran escalate. “We’ve seen this story over and over,“ Hamawi says, pointing to the futility of “shock and awe“ strategies that leave nations destabilized and troops scarred. This isn’t just policy critique; it’s a call for reflection on the true cost of war.
Experts echo Hamawi’s sentiments, with military analysts warning that Hegseth’s religious fervor—evident in his Pentagon remarks invoking divine wrath—blurs the line between strategy and extremism. Such rhetoric, Hamawi notes, is dangerously out of step with the humility expected from defense leaders.
The interview reveals Hamawi’s commitment to accountability, particularly regarding abuses by agencies like ICE. As an immigrant himself, he vows to hold officials responsible if elected, emphasizing that “following orders“ isn’t an excuse for wrongdoing, a lesson from history.
In New Jersey, voters are resonating with Hamawi’s message. On the campaign trail, he hears frustrations over rising costs and misplaced priorities, with constituents questioning why war funding overshadows critical needs. His platform rejects corporate influences, relying on grassroots support to drive change.
This breaking story underscores a pivotal moment in U.S. foreign policy, where veteran voices like Hamawi challenge the status quo. With elections looming, his call for a more restrained approach could sway public opinion and force a reckoning in Washington.
As global conflicts intensify, Hamawi’s insights from the front lines offer a stark reminder: war’s true face is not glory, but grief. His interview with Ken Harbaugh cuts through the bravado, demanding that leaders prioritize diplomacy over destruction to preserve lives and legitimacy.
The urgency of this narrative is palpable, as Hamawi’s experiences in Iraq and Gaza paint a vivid picture of devastation. He argues that without adherence to international norms, the U.S. risks isolating itself on the world stage, losing the moral high ground it once claimed.
In closing, Hamawi’s outspoken stance serves as a wake-up call. As he campaigns for Congress, his message resonates beyond politics, urging Americans to demand better from their leaders and support those who serve without blind allegiance to flawed policies.
This developing story highlights the intersection of military experience and political ambition, with Hamawi positioning himself as a voice for reform. His interview not only critiques current threats but also charts a path toward a more accountable future, one free from the shadows of endless conflict.